In the Justice Department’s leak investigation, Apple and Microsoft turned over so-called metadata of people who worked in Congress, including phone records, device information and addresses. Garland sidestepped criticism of the Trump administration’s decisions and said the seizure of records was made “under a set of policies that have existed for decades.” In congressional testimony this week, Attorney General Merrick B. The Justice Department has not commented publicly on Apple’s turning over House Intelligence Committee records. Google declined to comment on whether it received a subpoena related to the investigation on the House Intelligence Committee. “We will continue to aggressively seek reform that imposes reasonable limits on government secrecy in cases like this,” the company said. It said it notified the customer after the gag order expired and learned that the person was a congressional staff member. In a statement, Microsoft said it received a subpoena in 2017 related to a personal email account.
“Consistent with the request, Apple limited the information it provided to account subscriber information and did not provide any content such as emails or pictures.”
“In this case, the subpoena, which was issued by a federal grand jury and included a nondisclosure order signed by a federal magistrate judge, provided no information on the nature of the investigation, and it would have been virtually impossible for Apple to understand the intent of the desired information without digging through users’ accounts,” he said. Barr and Jeff Sessions testify before Congress about the leak investigations, specifically about the subpoena issued to Apple and another to Microsoft.įred Sainz, an Apple spokesman, said in a statement that the company regularly challenged government data requests and informed affected customers as soon as it legally could. Top Senate Democrats also demanded that the former attorneys general William P. On Friday, the Justice Department’s independent inspector general opened an investigation into the decision by federal prosecutors to secretly seize the data of House Democrats and reporters. He said given the “insane amount of data these companies have” and how everyone has a smartphone, most law enforcement investigations “at some point involve these companies.” Rozenshtein, an associate professor at the University of Minnesota’s law school and a former Justice Department lawyer. “There is definitely tension,” said Alan Z. Google argued that its contract as The Times’s corporate email provider required it to inform the newspaper of any government requests for its emails, said Ted Boutrous, an outside lawyer for The Times. In the first six months of 2020, Apple challenged 238 demands from the government for its customers’ account data, or 4 percent of such requests.Īs part of the same leak investigation by the Trump administration, Google fought a gag order this year on a subpoena to turn over data on the emails of four New York Times reporters. They can challenge some of the subpoenas if they are too broad or if they relate to a corporate client. The subpoenas can be vague, so Apple, Google and others are often unclear on the nature or subject of an investigation. The companies regularly comply with the requests because they are legally required to do so. The number of these requests has soared in recent years to thousands a week, putting Apple and other tech giants like Google and Microsoft in an uncomfortable position between law enforcement, the courts and the customers whose privacy they have promised to protect. The revelations have now plunged Apple into the middle of a firestorm over the Trump administration’s efforts to find the sources of news stories, and the handling underscores the flood of law enforcement requests that tech companies increasingly contend with. It was unclear what the department was investigating. McGahn II, the White House counsel to former President Donald J. It turned out the subpoena was part of a wide-ranging investigation by the Trump administration into leaks of classified information.Īround the same time, The Times reported on Sunday, Apple also turned over data on Donald F. Schiff of California, then the House Intelligence Committee’s top Democrat and now its chairman.
Without knowing it, Apple said, it had handed over the data of congressional staff members, their families and at least two members of Congress, including Representative Adam B.
Apple said it alerted the people who were the subjects of the subpoena, just as it does with dozens of customers each day.īut this request was out of the ordinary. This year, a gag order on the subpoena expired. An Apple paralegal complied and provided the information. It was one of the more than 250 data requests that the company received on average from U.S. 6, 2018, Apple received a grand jury subpoena for the names and phone records connected to 109 email addresses and phone numbers.
0 kommentar(er)
